A sensitive and specific method using ultra performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) was developed for the determination of levetiracetam (LEV) in plasma of neonates. A plasma aliquot of 50 μl was deproteinized by addition of 500 μl methanol which contained 5 μg/ml UCB 17025 as an internal standard. After centrifugation, 50 μl of supernatant was diluted with 1000 μl of 0.1% formic acid-10 mM ammonium formate in water (pH 3.5) (mobile phase solution A) and 2 μl was injected onto the UPLC-system. Compounds were separated on a Acquity UPLC BEH C18 2.1 mm × 100 mm column using gradient elution with mobile phase solution A and 0.1% formic acid in methanol (mobile phase solution B) with a flow rate of 0.4 ml/min and a total runtime of 4.0 min. LEV and the internal standard were detected using positive ion electrospray ionization followed by tandem mass spectrometry (ESI-MS/MS). The assay allowed quantification of LEV plasma concentrations in the range from 0.5 μg/ml to 150 μg/ml. Inter-assay inaccuracy was within ±2.7% and inter-assay precision was less than 4.5%. Matrix effects were minor: the recovery of LEV was between 97.7% and 100%. The developed method required minimal sample preparation and less plasma sample volume compared to earlier published LC-MS/MS methods. The method was successfully applied in a clinical pharmacokinetic study in which neonates received intravenous administrations of LEV for the treatment of neonatal seizures.

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
doi.org/10.1016/j.jchromb.2010.01.037, hdl.handle.net/1765/19436
Journal of Chromatography. B, Analytical Technologies in the Biomedical and Life Sciences
Erasmus MC: University Medical Center Rotterdam

Blonk, M., van der Nagel, B., Smit, L., & Mathôt, R. (2010). Quantification of levetiracetam in plasma of neonates by ultra performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Journal of Chromatography. B, Analytical Technologies in the Biomedical and Life Sciences, 878(7-8), 675–681. doi:10.1016/j.jchromb.2010.01.037