2008
Methodological quality and publication bias in observational studies on risk of rupture of unruptured intracranial aneurysms
Publication
Publication
Stroke , Volume 39 - Issue 1
To the Editor: We would like to comment on some aspects of the very interesting updated meta-analysis on risk of rupture of unruptured intracranial aneurysms by Wermer and colleagues.1 First, with regard to the assessment of methodological quality of the included studies, the authors have rated studies as “good” when they fulfilled 3 criteria with regard to design, completeness of follow-up and certainty of diagnosis of subarachnoid hemorrhage. ...
Additional Metadata | |
---|---|
, , , , , , | |
doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.499582, hdl.handle.net/1765/22443 | |
Stroke | |
Organisation | Erasmus MC: University Medical Center Rotterdam |
van der Jagt, M., Koudstaal, P., Dippel, D., & Habbema, D. (2008). Methodological quality and publication bias in observational studies on risk of rupture of unruptured intracranial aneurysms. Stroke, 39(1). doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.499582 |