Myotonic dystrophy: The burden for patients and their partners
Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine , Volume 42 - Issue 9 p. 823- 830
Objective: Dystrophia myotonica is characterized by progressive muscular weakness, myotonia, mental slowness and lack of initiative, which causes problems in daily life both for patients and for their spouses. Some couples seem to deal with these problems satisfactorily, while for others they are quite burdensome. The aim of this study was to describe the relationship of severity of dystrophia myotonica and psychological wellbeing in patients and partners. Methods: Sixty-nine couples, in whom one partner had dystrophia myotonica, completed questionnaires on severity of dystrophia myotonica, marital satisfaction, anxiety and depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), hopelessness (Beck Hopelessness Scale) and general psychological health (General Health Questionnaire-12). Results: For patients, a worse view of the future, worse general wellbeing, more anxiety and more depression was associated with a greater need for help. For partners, worse general wellbeing and more anxiety was associated with a lack of initiative of the patient and less marital satisfaction. It is noteworthy that 40% of patients and particularly female partners had Beck Hopelessness Scale scores suggestive of clinically relevant depression. Conclusion: Dystrophia myotonica places a heavy burden on patients, and especially on female partners. The need for help and dependency has more influence on the wellbeing of patients than the symptoms of dystrophia myotonica themselves. Marital satisfaction is a strong predictor of better wellbeing, both for patients and, even more so, for partners.
|Burden of disease, Dystrophia myotonica, Familial caregivers, Myotonic dystrophy, Psychological wellbeing|
|Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine|
|Organisation||Erasmus MC: University Medical Center Rotterdam|
Timman, R, Tibben, A, & Wintzen, A.R. (2010). Myotonic dystrophy: The burden for patients and their partners. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 42(9), 823–830. doi:10.2340/16501977-0598