Adherence to patient selection criteria in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation with the 18F CoreValve ReValving system
Background: Anecdotal evidence suggests that transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is being used beyond pre-market label indications. Methods: To assess the frequency and outcomes associated with "off-label" use of TAVI, we conducted a retrospective study, examining adherence to patient selection criteria in 63 patients undergoing implantation with the 18F CoreValve ReValving System (CRS). Label status (on-label vs off-label) was determined by following (1) inclusion/exclusion criteria indicated in the 18F CRS safety and efficacy trial and (2) a patient selection matrix indicating anatomical boundaries to guide patient selection. Off-label use was defined as the presence of at least one exclusion criterion or "non-acceptable" criteria based on the patient selection matrix. Results: Off-label implantation was identified in 42 patients (67%)-40% had one, 19% had two and 8% had three or more off-label criteria. Baseline demographics were similar between the groups except for a higher logistic EuroSCORE in the on-label group (19.8 (11.2) vs 14.5 (7.3), p=0.029). There was no significant difference in the procedural success rates between the on-label and off-label groups (91% vs 95%, respectively, p=0.47). The frequency of angiographic moderatesevere aortic regurgitation, post-implant dilatation or implantation of a second valve was also similar between the groups. At 30 days, the cumulative death rate was 10%; there were four deaths in the "on-label" and three deaths in the "off-label" group. Conclusion: In this study we found that "off-label" implantation of the CRS was common. Further studies are needed to evaluate the consequences of "label status" for patients undergoing TAVI.
|Persistent URL||dx.doi.org/10.1136/hrt.2009.172809, hdl.handle.net/1765/28416|
Piazza, N, Otten, A, Schultz, C.J, Onuma, Y, Garcia-Garcia, H.M, Boersma, H, … Serruys, P.W.J.C. (2010). Adherence to patient selection criteria in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation with the 18F CoreValve ReValving system. Heart, 96(1), 19–26. doi:10.1136/hrt.2009.172809