'Extra-welfarism' has received some attention in health economics, yet there is little consensus on what distinguishes it from more conventional 'welfarist economics'. In this paper, we seek to identify the characteristics of each in order to make a systematic comparison of the ways in which they evaluate alternative social states. The focus, though this is not intended to be exclusive, is on health. Specifically, we highlight four areas in which the two schools differ: (i) the outcomes considered relevant in an evaluation; (ii) the sources of valuation of the relevant outcomes; (iii) the basis of weighting of relevant outcomes and (iv) interpersonal comparisons. We conclude that these differences are substantive.

Additional Metadata
Keywords Extra-welfarism, Health economics, Welfare, Welfarism
Persistent URL dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2007.07.003, hdl.handle.net/1765/29445
Journal Journal of Health Economics
Citation
Brouwer, W.B.F, Culyer, A.J, van Exel, N.J.A, & Rutten-van Mölken, M.P.M.H. (2008). Welfarism vs. extra-welfarism. Journal of Health Economics, 27(2), 325–338. doi:10.1016/j.jhealeco.2007.07.003