Male circumcision for HIV prevention in sub-Saharan Africa: Who, what and when?
AIDS , Volume 22 - Issue 14 p. 1841- 1850
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Male circumcision (circumcision) reduces HIV incidence in men by 50-60%. The United Nations Joint Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) recommends the provision of safe circumcision services in countries with high HIV and low circumcision prevalence, prioritizing 12-30 years old HIV-uninfected men. We explore how the population-level impact of circumcision varies by target age group, coverage, time-to-scale-up, level of risk compensation and circumcision of HIV-infected men. DESIGN AND METHODS: An individual-based model was fitted to the characteristics of a typical high-HIV-prevalence population in sub-Saharan Africa and three scenarios of individual-level impact corresponding to the central and the 95% confidence level estimates from the Kenyan circumcision trial. The simulated intervention increased the prevalence of circumcision from 25 to 75% over 5 years in targeted age groups. The impact and cost-effectiveness of the intervention were calculated over 2-50 years. Future costs and effects were discounted and compared with the present value of lifetime HIV treatment costs (US$ 4043). RESULTS: Initially, targeting men older than the United Nations Joint Programme on HIV/AIDS recommended age group may be the most cost-effective strategy, but targeting any adult age group will be cost-saving. Substantial risk compensation could negate impact, particularly if already circumcised men compensate. If circumcision prevalence in HIV-uninfected men increases less because HIV-infected men are also circumcised, this will reduce impact in men but would have little effect on population-level impact in women. CONCLUSION: Circumcision is a cost-saving intervention in a wide range of scenarios of HIV and initial circumcision prevalence but the United Nations Joint Programme on HIV/AIDS/WHO recommended target age group should be widened to include older HIV-uninfected men and counselling should be targeted at both newly and already circumcised men to minimize risk compensation. To maximize infections-averted, circumcision must be scaled up rapidly while maintaining quality.
|Cost-effectiveness, Epidemiology, Male circumcision, Mathematical model, Primary prevention, Sexually transmitted diseases, Sub-Saharan Africa|
|Organisation||Erasmus MC: University Medical Center Rotterdam|
White, R.G, Glynn, J.R, Orroth, K.K, Freeman, E.E, Bakker, R, Weiss, H.A, … Hayes, R.J. (2008). Male circumcision for HIV prevention in sub-Saharan Africa: Who, what and when?. AIDS, 22(14), 1841–1850. doi:10.1097/QAD.0b013e32830e0137