Did accelerated filing requirements and SOX Section 404 affect the timeliness of 10-K filings?
Review of Accounting Studies , Volume 17 - Issue 2 p. 227- 253
This paper examines the effect of Sarbanes-Oxley provisions on 10-K filing delays. We find that tightened filing deadlines for accelerated and large accelerated filers are not associated with changes in the incidence of late filing. While Section 404 compliance does not affect filing timeliness for firms with effective internal controls, we find that about half the firms disclosing internal control weaknesses are late filers. As a consequence, many Section 404 material weakness firms experience negative abnormal returns around late filing notifications before filing the 10-K. Lastly, we find that market reactions to late filing notifications are more negative when management provides no meaningful explanation for the delay, consistent with managers' incentives to withhold bad news.
|Accelerated filing, Form 10-K, Internal controls, Rule 12b-25, SOX Section 404|
|Information and Market Efficiency; Event Studies (jel G14), Government Policy and Regulation (jel G18), Corporation and Securities Law (jel K22), Accounting (jel M41)|
|ERIM Top-Core Articles|
|Review of Accounting Studies|
|Organisation||Erasmus Research Institute of Management|
Impink, J, Lubberink, M, van Praag, B, & Veenman, D. (2012). Did accelerated filing requirements and SOX Section 404 affect the timeliness of 10-K filings?. Review of Accounting Studies, 17(2), 227–253. doi:10.1007/s11142-011-9172-5