Response to letter regarding article, "intracoronary versus intravenous administration of abciximab in patients with st-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention with thrombus aspiration: The comparison of intracoronary versus intravenous abciximab administration during emergency reperfusion of st-segment elevation myocardial infarction

2011-08-23

Circulation (Baltimore) , Volume 124 - Issue 8

Additional Metadata
Persistent URL	doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.032961, hdl.handle.net/1765/33324
Journal	Circulation (Baltimore)
Organisation	Erasmus MC: University Medical Center Rotterdam
Citation APA APA Style APA-ALL Style AAA Style Cell Style Chicago Style Harvard Style IEEE Style MLA Style Nature Style Vancouver Style American-Institute-of-Physics Style Council-of-Science-Editors Style BibTex Format Endnote Format RIS Format CSL Format DOIs only Format	Gu, Y., Kampinga, M., Wieringa, W., Fokkema, M., Hillege, H., van den Heuvel, A., Tan, E.-S., Pundziute, G., van der Werf, R., Guyomi, S. H., van der Horst, I., de Smet, B., Nijsten, M.& Zijlstra, F. (2011). Response to letter regarding article, "intracoronary versus intravenous administration of abciximab in patients with st-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention with thrombus aspiration: The comparison of intracoronary versus intravenous abciximab administration during emergency reperfusion of st-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Circulation (Baltimore), 124(8).https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.032961

Publication