Purpose: We determined whether nephrocalcinosis is common and whether its detection is influenced by renal tissue processing. Materials and Methods: Renal cortical and papillary tissue was obtained from the unaffected parts of 15 kidneys removed due to an oncological indication. The effect of tissue processing on the loss of crystals was studied in a kidney with nephrocalcinosis due to chronic pyelonephritis. Immediately frozen and formaldehyde fixed sections were analyzed by polarized light and Raman spectroscopy, and stained for calcium (Yasue) and hyaluronan. Results: Although 13 of 15 snap-frozen sections from tumor kidneys contained birefringent particles (mean ± SD 3.2 ± 2.9 particles per cm2) in the renal tubules, this was not considered nephrocalcinosis because the crystals were not attached to the epithelial lining. Interstitial nephrocalcinosis was found on Yasue stain in 3 of 15 kidneys with tumor (20%). Calcium deposits were found in the papillary interstitium only, always together with hyaluronan. Formaldehyde fixed sections from the pyelonephritis kidney contained fewer renal tubular cell associated birefringent particles than immediately frozen sections (9.4 ± 1.9 vs 41.6 ± 1.2 per cm2). Particles were composed of calcium oxalate monohydrate (Yasue and Raman). Conclusions: There are 2 distinct forms of nephrocalcinosis, including tubular nephrocalcinosis, which seems to be reserved for specific conditions such as chronic pyelonephritis, and interstitial nephrocalcinosis. The incidence of tubular calcium oxalate nephrocalcinosis could be underestimated due to the loss of crystals during tissue processing for routine histology. The crystal binding molecule hyaluronan may have a role in the 2 forms of nephrocalcinosis.

, , ,
doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2007.05.008, hdl.handle.net/1765/35229
The Journal of Urology
Erasmus MC: University Medical Center Rotterdam

Kummeling, M., de Jong, B., Laffeber, C., Kok, D., Verhagen, P., Leenders, G., … Verkoelen, C. F. (2007). Tubular and Interstitial Nephrocalcinosis. The Journal of Urology, 178(3), 1097–1103. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2007.05.008