2013-08-01
Is mipomersen ready for clinical implementation? A transatlantic dilemma
Publication
Publication
Current Opinion in Lipidology , Volume 24 - Issue 4 p. 301- 306
Purpose of review: Mipomersen has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration as an orphan drug for patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH). In contrast, the European Medicines Agency advised negatively on the use of mipomersen. In this review, we discuss the efficacy and safety considerations for this discrepancy. Recent findings: On the basis of the results of clinical trials with mipomersen, safety concerns have been raised regarding cardiovascular risk reduction and development of hepatic steatosis. In addition, (long-term) tolerability concerns have been raised predominantly regarding injection site reactions. A pooled analysis of cardiovascular events in phase III trials with mipomersen did not provide evidence for either a positive or negative effect on cardiovascular disease. Although long-term studies with mipomersen are eagerly awaited, hepatic fat content appears to stabilize after 6-12 months notwithstanding continued mipomersen administration. Summary: HoFH is a disease with an unmet medical need for new lipid-lowering therapies. On the basis of a mean 2.9 mmol/l LDL-cholesterol reduction, mipomersen is expected to reduce cardiovascular risk in HoFH. Available evidence suggests that the fat accumulation associated with this treatment differs from steatohepatitis, which is a progressive and damaging liver disease. No evidence is available suggesting that injection site reactions because of mipomersen treatment will result in safety issues.
Additional Metadata | |
---|---|
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | |
doi.org/10.1097/MOL.0b013e328362dfd9, hdl.handle.net/1765/41261 | |
Current Opinion in Lipidology | |
Organisation | Erasmus MC: University Medical Center Rotterdam |
Sjouke, B., Balak, D., Beuers, U., Ratziu, V., & Stroes, E. (2013). Is mipomersen ready for clinical implementation? A transatlantic dilemma. Current Opinion in Lipidology (Vol. 24, pp. 301–306). doi:10.1097/MOL.0b013e328362dfd9 |