The principal objective of the work is to construct an analytically precise methodology which can serve to identify, eliminate, and avoid a certain widespread conceptual fault or misconstruction, called a "projective misconstruction" or "projection" by the author. It is argued that this variety of error in our thinking (i) infects a great number of our everyday, scientific, and philosophical concepts, claims, and theories, (ii) has largely been undetected, and (iii) when remedied, leads to a less controversial and more rigorous elucidation of the transcendental preconditions of human knowledge than has traditionally been possible. The dissertation identifies, perhaps for the first time, a projective variety of self-referential inconsistency, and proposes an innovative, self-reflexive approach to transcendental argument in a logical and phenomenological context. The strength of the approach lies, it is claimed, in the fact that a rejection of the approach is possible only on pain of self-referential inconsistency. The argument is developed in the following stages: A general introduction identifies the central theme of the work, defines the scope of applicability of the results reached, and sketches the direction of the studies which follow. The preliminary discussion culminates in a recognition of the need for a critique of impure reason.

P. Ricoeur (Paul)
Erasmus University Rotterdam
A Dissertation submitted to the Faculté des Lettres et Sciences Humaines, Université de Paris (X), Nanterre in a double language format -- French (Vol. 1) and English (Vol. 2) --
RePub (University Library)

Bartlett, S.J. (1971, January 19). A Relativistic Theory of Phenomenological Constitution: A Self-Referential, Transcendental Approach to Conceptual Pathology. Erasmus University Rotterdam. Retrieved from