Comparison of coronary imaging between magnetic resonance imaging and electron beam computed tomography.

Additional Metadata
Keywords	Adult, Aged, Artifacts, Coronary Stenosis/diagnosis, Diagnostic Errors, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Angiography/methods/standards, Male, Middle Aged, Sensitivity and Specificity, Tomography, X-Ray Computed/*methods/standards
Persistent URL	hdl.handle.net/1765/4776
Journal	The American Journal of Cardiology
Organisation	Erasmus MC: University Medical Center Rotterdam
Citation APA Style AAA Style APA Style Cell Style Chicago Style Harvard Style IEEE Style MLA Style Nature Style Vancouver Style American-Institute-of-Physics Style Council-of-Science-Editors Style BibTex Format Endnote Format RIS Format CSL Format DOIs only Format	Rensing, B., Bongaerts, A., de Bruin, H., Serruys, P., de Feyter, P., van Geuns, R. J., … Oudkerk, M. (2002). Comparison of coronary imaging between magnetic resonance imaging and electron beam computed tomography. The American Journal of Cardiology, 58–63. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1765/4776

Publication