Empirical evidence on sustainability of programs that improve the quality of care delivery over time is lacking. Therefore, this study aims to identify the predictive role of short and long term improvements in quality of chronic care delivery on program sustainability.
In this longitudinal study, professionals [2010 (T0): n ¼ 218, 55% response rate; 2011 (T1): n ¼ 300, 68% response rate; 2012 (T2): n ¼ 265, 63% response rate] from 22 Dutch disease-management programs completed surveys assessing quality of care and program sustainability. Our study findings indicated that quality of chronic care delivery improved significantly in the first 2 years after implementation of the disease-management programs. At T1, overall quality, self-management support, delivery system design, and integration of chronic care components, as well as health care delivery and clinical information systems and decision support, had improved. At T2, overall quality again improved significantly, as did community linkages, delivery system design, clinical information systems, decision support and integration of chronic care components, and self-management support. Multilevel regression analysis revealed that quality of chronic care delivery at T0 (p < 0.001) and quality changes in the first (p < 0.001) and second (p < 0.01) years predicted program sustainability. In conclusion this study showed that disease-management programs based on the chronic care model improved the quality of chronic care delivery over time and that short and long term changes in the quality of chronic care delivery predicted the sustainability of the projects.

Additional Metadata
Keywords Sustainability, Quality improvement, Chronic care, Disease management, Chronic diseases
Persistent URL dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.11.035, hdl.handle.net/1765/50560
Journal Social Science & Medicine
Citation
Cramm, J.M, & Nieboer, A.P. (2014). Short and long term improvements in quality of chronic care delivery predict program sustainability. Social Science & Medicine, 101, 148–154. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.11.035