The Idea of Human Security
Prelude: The Surprising Spread of ‘Human Security’ Discourse
The language of ‘human security’ that became prominent in the 1990s has encountered criticism from many sides. Nonetheless, over the past twenty years it has continued to gain momentum. One encounters it frequently now, not only in debates about physical security, but in discussions of environment, migration, socioeconomic rights, culture, gender and more. Werthes and Debiel (2006: 8) propose that “human security provides a powerful ‘political leitmotif’ for particular states and multilateral actors by fulfilling selected functions in the process of agenda-setting, decision-making and implementation.” I suggest that in order to understand human security discourse and its spread, this specification of actors and functions should be broadened. The relevant actors include more than states and multilateral agencies, and what was originally primarily a language in United Nations circles is now far more encompassing. Like the sister idea of human rights, human security is becoming an idiom that plays important roles in motivating and directing attention, and in problem recognition, diagnosis, evaluation and response.
|Series||ISS Staff Group 2: States, Societies and World Development|
Gasper, D.R. (2013). The Idea of Human Security. In Human Security - vol.1: Concept and Critique (pp. 325–349). Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1765/50707