Abstract

The traditional and dominant view among lawyers is that law is a system and that it originates with the state. Today’s contrary view among some lawyers and a host of researchers from other disciplines says that law is plural in form and in source. Both views seem to rule each other out, seem to speak different languages, differ in assumptions and assign different normative tasks to law. Legal pluralism is the topic of this special issue, addressed in different ways, from different theoretical perspectives and in different empirical contexts. The first two articles in this special issue make clear that the debate over law as a plural phenomenon firstly bears a civilizing historical trait, and secondly has an ethnocentric component. Both articles make clear why many lawyers have a problem with viewing law as plural.

hdl.handle.net/1765/51161
Erasmus Law Review
Erasmus Law Review
Erasmus School of Law

van Rossum, W., & Taekema, S. (2013). Introduction to Law as Plural Phenomenon:
Confrontations of Legal Pluralisms. Erasmus Law Review, 6(3-4), 155–157. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1765/51161