Prehospital versus hospital fibrinolytic therapy using automated versus cardiologist electrocardiographic diagnosis of myocardial infarction: Abortion of myocardial infarction and unjustified fibrinolytic therapy

2004-03-01

American Heart Journal , Volume 147 - Issue 3 p. 509- 515

Additional Metadata
Persistent URL	doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2003.10.007, hdl.handle.net/1765/54182
Journal	American Heart Journal
Organisation	Department of Cardiology
Citation APA Style AAA Style APA Style Cell Style Chicago Style Harvard Style IEEE Style MLA Style Nature Style Vancouver Style American-Institute-of-Physics Style Council-of-Science-Editors Style BibTex Format Endnote Format RIS Format CSL Format DOIs only Format	Lamfers, E., Schut, A., Hertzberger, D., Hooghoudt, T., Stolwijk, P. W., Boersma, E., … Verheugt, F. (2004). Prehospital versus hospital fibrinolytic therapy using automated versus cardiologist electrocardiographic diagnosis of myocardial infarction: Abortion of myocardial infarction and unjustified fibrinolytic therapy. American Heart Journal, 147(3), 509–515. doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2003.10.007

Publication