Natural history of benign prostatic hyperplasia: Appropriate case definition and estimation of its prevalence in the community

There is no consensus about a case definition of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). In the present study, BPH prevalence rates were determined using various case definitions based on a combination of clinical parameters used to describe the properties of BPH: symptoms of prostatism, prostate volume increase, and bladder outflow obstruction. The aim of this study—in a community-based population of 502 men (55–74 years of age) without prostate cancer—was to determine the relative impact on prevalence rates of the inclusion of these different parameters (and of different cutoff values for these parameters) in a case definition of BPH. There is agreement that age is the dominant determinant of BPH. However, of 28 different case definitions that were formulated only eight gave a statistically significant increase in the prevalence of BPH with age. The highest overall prevalence of 19% (95% confidence interval [CI], 15–23%) occurred using the definition that combines a prostate volume >30 cm3 and an International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) >7. The lowest prevalence rate of 4.3% (95% CI, 2-6%) occurred using the definition that combines a prostate volume >30 cm3, an IPSS >7, a maximum flow rate <10 mL/s, and the presence of a postvoid residual urine volume >50 mL Thus, prevalence rates depend very much on the parameters used in a case definition. Follow-up will establish which men will eventually request a workup and treatment for BPH and will help determine the best clinical definition of BPH.

• View at Publisher
• View at Pubmed
• View at Scopus

Free Full Text ( Final Version , 719kb )