2002-03-01
Testing Inference to the Best Explanation
Publication
Publication
Synthese , Volume 130 - Issue 3 p. 355- 377
Inference to the Best Explanation has become the subject of a lively debate in the philosophy of science. Scientific realists maintain, while scientific antirealists deny, that it is a compelling rule of inference. It seems that any attempt to settle this debate empirically must beg the question against the antirealist. The present paper argues that this impression is misleading. A method is described that, by combining Glymour's theory of bootstrapping and Hacking's arguments from microscopy, allows us to test IBE without begging any antirealist issues.
Additional Metadata | |
---|---|
doi.org/10.1023/A:1014859910339, hdl.handle.net/1765/55471 | |
Synthese | |
Organisation | Erasmus School of Philosophy |
Douven, I. (2002). Testing Inference to the Best Explanation. Synthese, 130(3), 355–377. doi:10.1023/A:1014859910339 |