2005-08-01
How (not) to raise money
Publication
Publication
Journal of Political Economy , Volume 113 - Issue 4 p. 897- 918
We show that standard winner-pay auctions are inept fund-raising mechanisms because of the positive externality bidders forgo if they top another's high bid. Revenues are suppressed as a result and remain finite even when bidders value a dollar donated the same as a dollar kept. This problem does not occur in lotteries and all-pay auctions, where bidders pay irrespective of whether they win. We introduce a general class of all-pay auctions, rank their revenues, and illustrate how they dominate lotteries and winner-pay formats. The optimal fund-raising mechanism is an all-pay auction augmented with an entry fee and reserve price.
Additional Metadata | |
---|---|
doi.org/10.1086/431288, hdl.handle.net/1765/57811 | |
Journal of Political Economy | |
Organisation | Erasmus School of Economics |
Goeree, J., Maasland, E., Onderstal, S., & Turner, J. (2005). How (not) to raise money. Journal of Political Economy, 113(4), 897–918. doi:10.1086/431288 |