Remifentanil as a single drug for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: A comparison of infusion doses in terms of analgesic potency and side effects
Anesthesia and Analgesia , Volume 101 - Issue 2 p. 365- 370
This randomized, double-blind study was designed to evaluate analgesic effectiveness and side effects of two remifentanil infusion rates in patients undergoing extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for renal stones. We included 200 patients who were administered remifentanil either 0.05 μg · kg-1 · min-1 (n = 100) or 0.1 μg · kg-1min-1 (n = 100) plus demand bolus of 10 μg of remifentanil via a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device. No other sedating drugs were given. The frequencies of PCA demands and deliveries were recorded. Arterial blood pressure, oxygen saturation, and respiratory rate were recorded throughout the procedure; postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), dizziness, itching, agitation, and respiratory depression were measured post-treatment. Visual analog scale (VAS) scores were taken preoperatively, directly postoperatively, and 30 min after finishing the procedure. There were no statistically significant differences in the frequency of PCA demands and delivered boluses or among perioperative VAS scores. The extent of PONV and frequency of dizziness and itching immediately after and dizziness 30 min after the end of treatment were significantly reduced in the smaller dose group. We conclude that a remifentanil regimen of 0.05 μg · kg-1 · min-1 plus 10 μg demands is superior to 0.1 μg · kg-1 · min-1 plus demands, as there was no difference in the VAS scores recorded between groups and it has a less frequent incidence of side effects in patients receiving ESWL.
|Anesthesia and Analgesia|
|Organisation||Department of Anesthesiology|
Medina, H.J, Galvin, E, Dirckx, M, Banwarie, P, Ubben, J.F, Zijlstra, F.J, … Verbrugge, S.J.C. (2005). Remifentanil as a single drug for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: A comparison of infusion doses in terms of analgesic potency and side effects. Anesthesia and Analgesia, 101(2), 365–370. doi:10.1213/01.ANE.0000159379.54705.84