2005-09-01
Hepatic imaging: Comparison of modalities
Publication
Publication
Radiologic Clinics of North America , Volume 43 - Issue 5 SPEC. ISS. p. 929- 947
Proposed strategy for comprehensive hepatic imaging. A large number of comparative studies concerning the preoperative imaging of focal liver lesions have been published. Many studies have various limitations. Nevertheless, a number of conclusions can be drawn: MR imaging has a larger area under the ROC curve than US, CT, and CTAP. MR imaging has a higher sensitivity and specificity than US, CT, CTAP, or PET. The findings from the literature suggest that the state-of-the-art MR imaging of the liver should play a pivotal role as a comprehensive approach for the work-up of patients with suspected or known liver abnormalities (Fig. 17). Modern CT is the most comparable modality to MR imaging in its overall diagnostic accuracy, but a use of MR imaging will be the increasing concern of the risks of cancer induction by excessive use of CT.
Additional Metadata | |
---|---|
doi.org/10.1016/j.rcl.2005.05.006, hdl.handle.net/1765/60200 | |
Radiologic Clinics of North America | |
Organisation | Department of Radiology |
Hussain, S., & Semelka, R. (2005). Hepatic imaging: Comparison of modalities. Radiologic Clinics of North America (Vol. 43, pp. 929–947). doi:10.1016/j.rcl.2005.05.006 |