This paper conducts a horse-race of different liquidity proxies using dynamic asset allocation strategies to evaluate the short-horizon predictive ability of liquidity on monthly stock returns. We assess the economic value of the out-of-sample power of empirical models based on different liquidity measures and find three key results: liquidity timing leads to tangible economic gains; a risk-averse investor will pay a high performance fee to switch from a dynamic portfolio strategy based on various liquidity measures to one that conditions on the Zeros measure (Lesmond et al., 1999); the Zeros measure outperforms other liquidity measures because of its robustness in extreme market conditions. These findings are stable over time and robust to controlling for existing market return predictors or considering risk-adjusted returns.

Economic valuation, Expected returns, Forecasting, Liquidity
dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2013.09.010, hdl.handle.net/1765/61157
ERIM Top-Core Articles
Journal of Banking & Finance
Erasmus Research Institute of Management

Karstanje, D, Sojli, E, Tham, W.W, & van der Wel, M. (2013). Economic valuation of liquidity timing. Journal of Banking & Finance, 37(12), 5073–5087. doi:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2013.09.010