Impact forces cannot explain the one-target advantage in rapid aimed hand movements
Human Movement Science , Volume 22 - Issue 3 p. 365- 376
A pointing movement is executed faster when a subject is allowed to stop at the first target than when the subject has to proceed to a second target ("one-target advantage"). Our hypothesis was that this is because the impact at the target helps to stop the finger when the finger does not have to proceed to a second target. This hypothesis would predict that the horizontal force at contact with the first target should be larger when there is only one-target. Modelling smooth movements with larger forces at contact using a minimum-jerk model, shows that the peak velocity is slightly higher and it occurs later during the movement when there is only one target. Although the one-target advantage was present in our experiment, the horizontal force at contact in the one-target condition was not larger than in the two-target condition. The time of the maximum velocity did not differ, but the maximum velocity was higher in the one-target condition. Thus our hypothesis is rejected, favouring a non-mechanical explanation of the one-target advantage.
|Impact force, Motor control, One-target advantage|
|Human Movement Science|
|Organisation||Department of Neuroscience|
Biegstraaten, M, Smeets, J.B.J, & Brenner, E. (2003). Impact forces cannot explain the one-target advantage in rapid aimed hand movements. Human Movement Science, 22(3), 365–376. doi:10.1016/S0167-9457(03)00050-2