This paper investigates whether it is possible to create value through the active management of direct property portfolios. Using data from the USA, the UK and Australia, we examine whether trading intensity and portfolio growth explain the risk and return characteristics of listed property companies. The results suggest that beating the market by pursuing tactical asset selection and investment timing strategies is difficult even when acquiring and disposing of properties in illiquid private property markets. When the property type in which the firm specializes is included as a control variable in the regressions, none of the portfolio management intensity indicators developed in this paper is significantly associated with abnormal performance or systematic risk.

, ,
doi.org/10.1007/s11146-007-9050-x, hdl.handle.net/1765/61617
Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics
Erasmus Research Institute of Management

Brounen, D., Eichholtz, P., & Ling, D. (2007). Trading intensity and real estate performance. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 35(4), 449–474. doi:10.1007/s11146-007-9050-x