Functional aspects of cross-legged sitting with special attention to piriformis muscles and sacroiliac joints
Clinical Biomechanics , Volume 21 - Issue 2 p. 116- 121
Background. Transversely oriented pelvic muscles such as the internal abdominal oblique, transversus abdominis, piriformis and pelvic floor muscles may contribute to sacroiliac joint stability by pressing the sacrum between the hipbones. Surface electromyographic measurements showed that leg crossing lowers the activity of the internal oblique abdominal muscle significantly. This suggests that leg crossing is a substitute for abdominal muscle activity. No previous studies addressed piriformis muscle and related pelvic structures in cross-legged sitting. Methods. Angles of pelvis and femur were measured in healthy subjects in standing, normal sitting and cross-legged sitting, and were used to simulate these postures on embalmed pelvises and measure piriformis muscle elongation. Deformations of pelvic ring and iliolumbar ligament caused by piriformis muscle force were measured on embalmed pelvises. Findings. Cross-legged sitting resulted in a relative elongation of the piriformis muscle of 11.7% compared to normal sitting and even 21.4% compared to standing. Application of piriformis muscle force resulted in inward deformation of the pelvic ring and compression of the sacroiliac joints and the dorsal side of the pubic symphysis. Interpretation. Cross-legged sitting is common. We believe that it contributes to sacroiliac joint stability. This study demonstrates the influence of the piriformis muscle on sacroiliac joint compression. The elongation of the piriformis muscle bilaterally by crossing the legs may be functional in the build-up of active or passive tension between sacrum and femur.
|, , , , , ,|
|Organisation||Department of Neuroscience|
Snijders, C.J, Hermans, P.F.G, & Kleinrensink, G.J. (2006). Functional aspects of cross-legged sitting with special attention to piriformis muscles and sacroiliac joints. Clinical Biomechanics, 21(2), 116–121. doi:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2005.09.002