Background: Conditions were studied that may invalidate health-state values derived from the visual analogue scale (VAS). Methods: Respondents were asked to place cards with descriptions of EQ-5D health states on a 20 cm EuroQol VAS and modified versions of it, positioning them such that the distances between the states reflect their valuation for these states. Anchor-point bias was examined using the standard EuroQol VAS (n = 212) and a modified version (n = 97) with a different lower anchor. Context bias was examined in another group of respondents (n = 112) who valued three different sets of EQ-5D health states. Marker bias was studied in yet another group of respondents (n = 100) who placed the same EQ-5D states on the standard EuroQol VAS and on a modified VAS without anchors, categories, or measurement markers. Results: No indication for the existence of the anchor-point and the marker bias was found. However, the VAS valuations were significantly affected by the context of the set of health states in the scaling task. Conclusion: Advanced methodologies should be incorporated in VAS valuation studies to deal with the context bias.

Bias, Health states, Measurement, Valuation techniques, Visual analogue scale
dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-006-0027-7, hdl.handle.net/1765/62015
Quality of Life Research
Department of Medical Psychology and Psychotherapy

Krabbe, P.F.M, Stalmeier, P.F.M, Lamers, L.M, & van Busschbach, J.J. (2006). Testing the interval-level measurement property of multi-item visual analogue scales. Quality of Life Research, 15(10), 1651–1661. doi:10.1007/s11136-006-0027-7