2005-06-17
Methodological considerations and approach to cross-technique comparisons using in vivo coronary plaque characterization based on intravascular ultrasound radiofrequency data analysis: Insights from the Integrated Biomarker and Imaging Study (IBIS)
Publication
Publication
International Journal of Cardiovascular Interventions , Volume 7 - Issue 1 p. 52- 58
Grey scale intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) is a valuable clinical tool to assess the extent and severity of coronary atheroma. However, it cannot reliably identify plaques with a high-risk of future clinical events. Serial IVUS studies to assess the progression and/or regression of atherosclerotic plaques demonstrated only modest effects, of pharmacological intervention on plaque burden, even when clinical efficacy is documented. Spectral analysis of radiofrequency ultrasound data (IVUS-virtual histology™ (IVUS-VH), Volcano Therapeutics, Rancho Cordova, CA) has the potential to characterize accurately plaque composition. The Integrated Biomarker and Imaging Study (IBIS) evaluated both invasive and non-invasive imaging techniques along with the assessment of novel biomarkers to characterize sub-clinical atherosclerosis. IVUS-VH was not included at the start of the IBIS protocol. The purpose of this paper is to describe the methodology we used to obtain and analyse IVUS-VH images and the approach to cross-correlations with the other techniques.
Additional Metadata | |
---|---|
, , , | |
doi.org/10.1080/14628840410030559, hdl.handle.net/1765/62194 | |
International Journal of Cardiovascular Interventions | |
Organisation | Erasmus MC: University Medical Center Rotterdam |
Rodriguez-Granillo, G., Aoki, J., Ong, A., Valgimigli, M., van Mieghem, C., Regar, E., … Serruys, P. (2005). Methodological considerations and approach to cross-technique comparisons using in vivo coronary plaque characterization based on intravascular ultrasound radiofrequency data analysis: Insights from the Integrated Biomarker and Imaging Study (IBIS). International Journal of Cardiovascular Interventions, 7(1), 52–58. doi:10.1080/14628840410030559 |