2013-10-01
Diagnostic value of a ghrelin test for the diagnosis of GH deficiency after subarachnoid hemorrhage
Publication
Publication
European Journal of Endocrinology , Volume 169 - Issue 4 p. 497- 502
Objective: To determine the diagnostic value of a ghrelin test in the diagnosis of GH deficiency (GHD) shortly after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). Design: Prospective single-center observational cohort study. Methods: A ghrelin test was assessed after the acute phase of SAH and a GH-releasing hormone (GHRH)-arginine test 6 months post SAH. Primary outcome was the diagnostic value of a ghrelin test compared with the GHRH-arginine test in the diagnosis of GHD. The secondary outcome was to assess the safety of the ghrelin test, including patients' comfort, adverse events, and idiosyncratic reactions. Results: Forty-three survivors of SAH were included (15 males, 35%, mean age 56.6G11.7). Six out of 43 (14%) SAH survivors were diagnosed with GHD by GHRH-arginine test. In GHD subjects, median GH peak during ghrelin test was significantly lower than that of non-GHD subjects (5.4 vs 16.6, PZ0.002). Receiver operating characteristics analysis showed an area under the curve of 0.869. A cutoff limit of a GH peak of 15 mg/l corresponded with a sensitivity of 100% and a false-positive rate of 40%. No adverse events or idiosyncratic reactions were observed in subjects undergoing a ghrelin test, except for one subject who reported flushing shortly after ghrelin infusion. Conclusion: Owing to its convenience, validity, and safety, the ghrelin test might be a valuable GH provocative test, especially in the early phase of SAH.
Additional Metadata | |
---|---|
doi.org/10.1530/EJE-13-0436, hdl.handle.net/1765/63873 | |
European Journal of Endocrinology | |
Organisation | Department of Rehabilitation Medicine |
Blijdorp, K., Khajeh, L., Ribbers, G., Sneekes, E., Heijenbrok-Kal, M., van den Berg-Emons, R., … Neggers, B. (2013). Diagnostic value of a ghrelin test for the diagnosis of GH deficiency after subarachnoid hemorrhage. European Journal of Endocrinology, 169(4), 497–502. doi:10.1530/EJE-13-0436 |