Prediction of Mortality Risk in the Elderly
The American Journal of Medicine , Volume 119 - Issue 6 p. 519- 525
Purpose: Ways to predict the risk of cardiovascular (CV) events or all-cause mortality have largely been derived from populations in which old and very old subjects were underrepresented. We set out to estimate the incremental prognostic utility of inflammation and atherosclerosis markers in the prediction of all-cause and CV mortality in elderly men. Methods: In a prospective population-based cohort study, conventional CV risk factors were documented in 403 independently living elderly men. C-reactive protein (CRP) and interleukin (IL)-6 levels were measured. Carotid plaques were assessed by ultrasound. Analyses were performed with proportional hazards analyses, and bootstrapping was used for internal validation. Main outcome was CV and all-cause mortality occurring during 4 years of follow-up. Results: Increasing tertiles of CRP, IL-6, and number of plaques were independently associated with all-cause and CV mortality. With information on age, carotid plaques, IL-6, and CRP yielded good discriminatory power for all-cause and CV mortality: area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (95% confidence interval), 0.76 (0.70-0.82) and 0.74 (0.68-0.80), respectively. Combined use of only IL-6 and plaque burden allowed identification of subjects with low and high mortality risk. The Framingham PROCAM and a Dutch Risk Function poorly predicted mortality risk, similar or worse than a model using age alone. Conclusion: In the old and very old, IL-6 and number of carotid plaques are powerful predictors of mortality risk in the years to come. Conventional risk scores seem to perform unsatisfactorily.
|Atherosclerosis, Elderly, Inflammation, Mortality, Prevention|
|The American Journal of Medicine|
Störk, S, Feelders, R.A, van den Beld, A.W, Steyerberg, E.W, Savelkoul, H.F.J, Lamberts, S.W.J, … Bots, M.L. (2006). Prediction of Mortality Risk in the Elderly. The American Journal of Medicine, 119(6), 519–525. doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2005.10.062