Pushed organizational pulls: Changing responsibilities, roles and relations of Dutch health care executives
Public Management Review: an international journal of research and theory , Volume 7 - Issue 1 p. 25- 43
This article presents empirical data on organizational reform in Dutch health care, and explores managerial work and behaviour. Two main questions will be answered. First, what organizational reforms are taking place, and how widespread are these reforms? Second, what do reforms mean for the real-life workings of health care organizations, most specifically for managerial behaviour? As far as reforms are concerned, it will be concluded that organizational changes are widespread, especially strategic apex reform and mergers. To a lesser extent, organizational structures are adapted and new relations between management and professionals are developed. Organizational and managerial contexts count albeit in unexpected ways. The professional context counts: management uses organizational reform to provide counterweight vis-à-vis and control of professionals. In addition, managerial background counts, but in a limited way: executives with limited managerial careers opt for organizational reform. Finally, organizational size counts, exerting a strong influence on organizational reform. As far as behavioural consequences are concerned, it will be concluded that organizational reform goes hand-in-hand with behavioural confusion. An 'organizational pull' appears to be strong. Executives are forced to be 'down to earth' managers, while they express 'exotic' desires to be strategists and entrepreneurs. Paradoxically, most organizational reforms strengthen this pull.
|Health care, Managerial behaviour, Managers/executives, Organizational (re)form|
|Public Management Review: an international journal of research and theory|
|Organisation||Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management (ESHPM)|
Noordegraaf, M, Meurs, P.L, & Stoopendaal, A.M.V. (2005). Pushed organizational pulls: Changing responsibilities, roles and relations of Dutch health care executives. Public Management Review: an international journal of research and theory, 7(1), 25–43. doi:10.1080/1471903042000339400