Pain relief during and following outpatient curettage and hysterosalpingography: A double blind study to compare the efficacy and safety of Tramadol versus Naproxen

Objective: To compare the analgetic efficacy and side-effects of Naproxen and Tramadol following the outpatient VABRA aspiration or hysterosalpingography. Setting: Ninety-one patients from the gynaecology clinics of two university hospitals and one municipal teaching hospital. Design: Multicentre double blind randomized clinical trial. Computerised randomisation, stratification per-centre. Methods: Semiquantitative assessment of the two drugs was performed by the patient and the gynaecologist using a 1- to 6-point scale. Pain, stress and well-being was scored by the patient using the visual analog scale (VAS) and the verbal description scale (VDS), ranging from 0 (good) to 100 (bad). Side-effects during the first 24 h postoperatively were recorded by the patient in a diary. Results: The analgetic efficacy (pain, stress and well-being) of Naproxen and Tramadol was identical. Subjective assessment by the patient and the doctor also revealed no differences between Naproxen and Tramadol. Side-effects of Tramadol, however, were significantly more severe than those of Naproxen and this phenomenon was responsible for a lower ability to proceed with normal activities in the Tramadol group. Conclusion: Tramadol is a good alternative for Naproxen at outpatient VABRA or HSG procedures when Naproxen is contra-indicated.

• View at Publisher
• View at Pubmed
• View at Scopus
• View at Web of Science