Set-up verification of cervix cancer patients treated with long treatment fields; implications of a non-rigid bony anatomy

Background and purpose: For cervix cancer patients, treatment fields may extend up to vertebra L1. In clinical practice, set-up verification is based on measured displacements of the pelvic rim as visible in the caudal part of the treatment fields. The implications of this procedure for the positions of bony structures in the cranial part of the fields were investigated. Materials and methods: Twelve patients had four repeat simulator sessions. Both during treatment simulation (the reference) and the repeat sessions, anterior radiographs were acquired covering the whole treatment field. The films were used to investigate differences between the cranial and the caudal parts of the treatment field in day-to-day bony anatomy displacements. Results: Both in the transversal and the longitudinal directions, these differences were significant (3.5 mm, 1 SD). Indications were found that large differences in the cranio-caudal direction may be correlated with (non-rigid) internal pelvic rim rotations around a lateral axis. In the longitudinal direction, the position of L1 correlated much better with the position of vertebra S1 than with the position of the pelvic rim, which is usually used for set-up verification. Conclusions: Due to the non-rigid bony anatomy of the studied patients, the usual set-up verification and correction procedure can result in set-up errors of 10 mm and more for structures in the cranial part of the treatment field, even in the case of a perfect set-up of the pelvic rim. Possibly, other patient set-up and immobilization procedures may result in a better day-to-day reproducibility of the 3D bony anatomy shape. (Remaining) Differences in anatomy position changes between the caudal and cranial field ends may be accounted for by using non-uniform clinical target volume-to-planning target volume margins, or by an adapted patient set-up verification and correction protocol.

• View at Publisher
• View at Pubmed
• View at Scopus
• View at Web of Science