Why have recent trials of neuroprotective agents in head injury failed to show convincing efficacy? A pragmatic analysis and theoretical considerations

1999-06-01

Neurosurgery , Volume 44 - Issue 6 p. 1286- 1298

Additional Metadata
Keywords	Clinical trials, Head injury, Neuroprotection, Outcome, Prognosis, Statistical analysis
Persistent URL	doi.org/10.1097/00006123-199906000-00076, hdl.handle.net/1765/72859
Journal	Neurosurgery
Organisation	Department of Neurosurgery
Citation APA Style AAA Style APA Style Cell Style Chicago Style Harvard Style IEEE Style MLA Style Nature Style Vancouver Style American-Institute-of-Physics Style Council-of-Science-Editors Style BibTex Format Endnote Format RIS Format CSL Format DOIs only Format	Maas, A., Steyerberg, E., Murray, G., Bullock, R., Baethmann, A., Marshall, L., & Teasdale, G. (1999). Why have recent trials of neuroprotective agents in head injury failed to show convincing efficacy? A pragmatic analysis and theoretical considerations. Neurosurgery (Vol. 44, pp. 1286–1298). doi:10.1097/00006123-199906000-00076

Publication