On intellectual innovation and the methodology of the history of ideas

Mark Bevir's Logic of the History of Ideas is discussed, focusing on the problematic of intellectual innovation. Sharing Bevir's anti-foundationalist position and his Wittgensteinian view of language, the article criticizes the overly rationalistic and individualist bias in his proposed logic for the history of ideas. It is further argued that Bevir's critique of contextualism is unconvincing because it is based on a far too crude view of the actual practice of historians of ideas.

• View at Publisher
• View at Scopus
• View at Web of Science