Several medical associations recommended lung cancer screening by low-dose computed tomography scanning for high-risk groups. Counselling of the candidates on the potential harms and benefits and their lung cancer risk is a prerequisite for screening. In the NELSON trial, screenings are considered positive for (part) solid lung nodules with a volume >500 mm3 and for (part) solid or nonsolid nodules with a volume-doubling time >400 days. For this study, the performance of the NELSON strategy in three screening rounds was evaluated and risk calculations were made for a follow-up period of 5.5 years. 458 (6%) of the 7582 participants screened had a positive screen result and 200 (2.6%) were diagnosed with lung cancer. The positive screenings had a predictive value of 40.6% and only 1.2% of all scan results were false-positive. In a period of 5.5 years, the risk of screen-detected lung cancer strongly depends on the result of the first scan: 1.0% after a negative baseline result, 5.7%after an indeterminate baseline and 48.3% after a positive baseline. The screening strategy yielded few positive and false-positive scans with a reasonable positive predictive value. The 5.5-year lung cancer risk calculations aid clinicians in counselling candidates for lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography.

Additional Metadata
Persistent URL dx.doi.org/10.1183/09031936.00197712, hdl.handle.net/1765/73755
Journal The European Respiratory Journal
Citation
Horeweg, N, van der Aalst, C.M, Vliegenthart, R, Zhao, Y, Xie, X, Scholten, E.T, … de Koning, H.J. (2013). Volumetric computed tomography screening for lung cancer: Three rounds of the NELSON trial. The European Respiratory Journal, 42(6), 1659–1667. doi:10.1183/09031936.00197712