2006
Medical consumption and costs during a one-year follow-up of patients with LUTS suggestive of BPH in Six European Countries: Report of the TRIUMPH study
Publication
Publication
European Urology : Official Journal of the European Association of Urology , Volume 49 - Issue 1 p. 92- 102
Objective: To determine the medical consumption and associated treatment costs of patients with LUTS suggestive of BPH. Methods: A prospective, cross-sectional, observational survey in six European countries: France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Spain and the United Kingdom, with a one-year follow-up of incident and prevalent patients. Results: Treatment costs were estimated for 5,057 patients with a mean age of 66 years and a mean IPSS score at inclusion of 11.5. In 30% of patients watchful waiting was the therapy of choice for the full follow-up period, 57% were prescribed alpha-lockers, 11% finasteride and 10% phytotherapy at any moment during the follow-up (including switches and combination of treatment). Surgery rate was 4.9%. Mean one-year treatment costs were €858 per patient, three quarters of which concerned medication costs. Multivariate regression analysis showed that medication choice, complications and undergoing surgery were associated with higher costs. Conclusions: Treatment costs for patients with LUTS suggestive of BPH were moderate and largely consisted of medication costs. Daily practice and associated costs varied considerably across the six countries.
Additional Metadata | |
---|---|
, , , , , , , | |
doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2005.09.016, hdl.handle.net/1765/73980 | |
European Urology : Official Journal of the European Association of Urology | |
Organisation | Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management (ESHPM) |
van Exel, J., Koopmanschap, M., McDonnell, J., Chapple, C., Berges, R., & Rutten, F. (2006). Medical consumption and costs during a one-year follow-up of patients with LUTS suggestive of BPH in Six European Countries: Report of the TRIUMPH study. European Urology : Official Journal of the European Association of Urology (Vol. 49, pp. 92–102). doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2005.09.016 |