2013-11-28
Interspinous process device versus standard conventional surgical decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: Randomized controlled trial
Publication
Publication
BMJ (Online) , Volume 347
Abstract
Objective To assess whether interspinous process device implantation
is more effective in the short term than conventional surgical
decompression for patients with intermittent neurogenic claudication
due to lumbar spinal stenosis.
Design Randomized controlled trial.
Setting Five neurosurgical centers (including one academic and four
secondary level care centers) in the Netherlands.
Participants 203 participants were referred to the Leiden-The Hague
Spine Prognostic Study Group between October 2008 and September
2011; 159 participants with intermittent neurogenic claudication due to
lumbar spinal stenosis at one or two levels with an indication for surgery
were randomized.
Interventions 80 participants received an interspinous process device
and 79 participants underwent spinal bony decompression.
Main outcome measures The primary outcome at short term (eight
weeks) and long term (one year) follow-up was the Zurich Claudication
Questionnaire score. Repeated measurements were made to compare
outcomes over time.
Results At eight weeks, the success rate according to the Zurich
Claudication Questionnaire for the interspinous process device group
(63%, 95% confidence interval 51% to 73%) was not superior to that for
standard bony decompression (72%, 60% to 81%). No differences in
disability (Zurich Claudication Questionnaire; P=0.44) or other outcomes
were observed between groups during the first year. The repeat surgery
rate in the interspinous implant group was substantially higher (n=21;
29%) than that in the conventional group (n=6; 8%) in the early
post-surgical period (P<0.001).
Conclusions This double blinded study could not confirm the
hypothesized short term advantage of interspinous process device over
conventional “simple” decompression and even showed a fairly high
reoperation rate after interspinous process device implantation.
Trial registration Dutch Trial Register NTR1307.
Additional Metadata | |
---|---|
doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f6415, hdl.handle.net/1765/74391 | |
BMJ (Online) | |
Organisation | Department of Neuroscience |
Moojen, W., Arts, M., Jacobs, W., van Zwet, E., van den Akker-van Marle, E., Koes, B., … Peul, W. (2013). Interspinous process device versus standard conventional surgical decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: Randomized controlled trial. BMJ (Online), 347. doi:10.1136/bmj.f6415 |