2004
The Importance of Ideals: Debating Their Relevance in Law, Morality, and Politics
Publication
Publication
Introduction: The Three Main Theses
In the fairly recent past, in the last decade of the cold war era, reference
to ideals evoked images of the stale ideologies of socialism and
communism and the failed utopianism that accompanied them. Ideals
did not have either theoretical or practical appeal. In some areas of
normative theory, however, the first strands of a reviving interest were
already forming. In ethical theory, Bernard Gert reasserted the category
of moral ideals as the main category apart from moral rules. In legal
theory, Ronald Dworkin started to include the ideal of integrity next to
principles. The attention for ideals has grown since, but, with some
exceptions, a systematic treatment of the role of ideals in law, morality,
or politics has been lacking. Ideals are posited without questioning the
concept; they are lumped together with virtues and purposes without
recognition of their distinctive role.
Additional Metadata | |
---|---|
hdl.handle.net/1765/77410 | |
Organisation | Erasmus School of Law |
van der Burg, W., & Taekema, S. (2004). The Importance of Ideals: Debating Their Relevance in Law, Morality, and Politics. In W. van der Burg & H.S. Taekema (eds.), The Importance of Ideals: Debating Their Relevance in Law, Morality, and Politics, Bruxelles, etc.: Peter Lang (pp. 11–38). Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1765/77410 |