Purpose There is no consensus on whether magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) should be included in breast screening protocols for women with BRCA1/2 mutations age ≥ 50 years. Therefore, we investigated the evidence on age-related screening accuracy in women with BRCA1/2 mutations using individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis. Patients and Methods IPD were pooled from six high-risk screening trials including women with BRCA1/2 mutations who had completed at least one screening round with both MRI and mammography. A generalized linear mixed model with repeated measurements and a random effect of studies estimated sensitivity and specificity of MRI, mammography, and the combination in all women and specifically in those age ≥ 50 years. Results Pooled analysis showed that in women age ≥ 50 years, screening sensitivity was not different from that in women age <50 years, whereas screening specificity was. In women age ≥ 50 years, combining MRI and mammography significantly increased screening sensitivity compared with mammography alone (94.1%; 95% CI, 77.7% to 98.7% v 38.1%; 95% CI, 22.4% to 56.7%; P < .001). The combination was not significantly more sensitive than MRI alone (94.1%; 95% CI, 77.7% to 98.7% v 84.4%; 95% CI, 61.8% to 94.8%; P =.28). Combining MRI and mammography in women age ≥ 50 years resulted in sensitivity similar to that in women age ≥ 50 years (94.1%; 95% CI, 77.7% to 98.7% v 93.2%; 95% CI, 79.3% to 98%; P =.79). Conclusion Addition of MRI to mammography for screening BRCA1/2 mutation carriers age ≥ 50 years improves screening sensitivity by a magnitude similar to that observed in younger women. Limiting screening MRI in BRCA1/2 carriers age ≥ 50 years should be reconsidered.

doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2014.56.6232, hdl.handle.net/1765/80170
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Erasmus MC: University Medical Center Rotterdam

Phi, X.-A., Houssami, N., Obdeijn, I.-M., Warner, E., Sardanelli, F., Leach, M., … de Bock, G. (2015). Magnetic resonance imaging improves breast screening sensitivity in BRCA mutation carriers age ≥50 years: Evidence from an individual patient data meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 33(4), 349–356. doi:10.1200/JCO.2014.56.6232