2000
MR imaging-guided sonography followed by fine-needle aspiration cytology in occult carcinoma of the breast
Publication
Publication
American Journal of Roentgenology , Volume 174 - Issue 4 p. 1079- 1084
OBJECTIVE. In patients with axillary metastases as clinical evidence of possible occult
breast cancer, a combined approach of MR imaging, sonography, and aspiration biopsy cytology
was evaluated.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Thirty-one women with metastatic adenocarcinoma
in their axillary lymph nodes originating from an unknown primary site underwent MR
imaging of the breast because physical examination and mammography findings were normal.
Twenty of the 31 women had no history of malignancy, 10 had been previously
treated for contralateral breast cancer, and one patient had nodal metastases in the contralateral
axilla at the time breast cancer was detected. When a contrast-enhancing lesion
was revealed on MR imaging of the breast, sonography and fine-needle aspiration cytology
were also performed.
RESULTS. MR imaging revealed the primary breast cancer in eight (40%) of the 20 patients
without a history of malignancy. MR imaging of the breast revealed a second primary
cancer in three (27%) of the 11 patients with previous or simultaneous breast cancer. All lesions
were identified with sonography and verified by cytology and histology.
CONCLUSION. In women with axillary lymph node metastases from adenocarcinoma,
MR imaging of the breast should be added to clinical examination and mammography before
defining the breast cancer as occult. The combined approach of MR imaging, sonography, and
aspiration fine-needle cytology is a good alternative to the MR imaging–guided biopsy
Additional Metadata | |
---|---|
hdl.handle.net/1765/80171 | |
American Journal of Roentgenology | |
Organisation | Department of Radiology |
Obdeijn, I.-M., Brouwers-Kuyper, E.M., Tilanus-Linthorst, M., Wiggers, T., & Oudkerk, M. (2000). MR imaging-guided sonography followed by fine-needle aspiration cytology in occult carcinoma of the breast. American Journal of Roentgenology, 174(4), 1079–1084. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1765/80171 |