Bentall Procedure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery , Volume 101 - Issue 5 p. 1684- 1690
Background The Bentall procedure is considered the gold standard in the treatment of patients requiring aortic root replacement. An up-to-date overview of outcomes after the Bentall procedure is lacking. Methods We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of characteristics of and long-term outcome after the Bentall procedure with a mechanical valve prosthesis. Pooling was performed using the inverse variance method within a random-effects model. Outcome events are reported as linearized occurrence rates (percentage per patient year) with 95% confidence intervals. Results In total, 46 studies with 7,629 patients (mean age, 50 years; 76% men) were selected. Pooled early mortality was 6% (422 patients). During a mean follow-up of 6 years (49,175 patient-years), the annual linearized occurrence rate for late mortality was 2.02% (1.77%- 2.31%; 892 patients), for aortic root reoperation it was 0.46% (0.36%-0.59%), for hemorrhage it was 0.64% (0.47%-0.87%), for thromboemboli it was 0.77% (0.60%-1.00%), for endocarditis it was 0.39% (0.33%-0.46%), and for major adverse valve-related events it was 2.66% (2.17%-3.24%). Operations performed in more recent years were associated with lower rates of aortic root reoperation (beta = -0.452; p = 0.015). Conclusions This systematic review illustrates that rates of aortic root reoperation after the Bentall procedure have decreased over the years. However, late mortality, major bleeding, and thromboembolic complications remain a concern. This report may be used to benchmark the potential therapeutic benefit of novel surgical approaches, such as valve-sparing aortic root replacement.
|The Annals of Thoracic Surgery|
|Organisation||Department of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery|
Mookhoek, A, Korteland, N.M, Arabkhani, B, Di Centa, I, Lansac, E, Bekkers, J.A, … Takkenberg, J.J.M. (2016). Bentall Procedure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery (Vol. 101, pp. 1684–1690). doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.10.090