Aims: We sought to investigate the impact of the self-apposing, sirolimus-eluting STENTYS stent on midterm and long-term stent apposition and strut coverage compared with a zotarolimus-eluting balloon-expandable stent in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI).

Methods and results: In the APPOSITION IV trial, 152 STEMI patients were randomised (3:2) to the self-apposing, sirolimus-eluting STENTYS stent or a commercially available zotarolimus-eluting balloon-expandable stent at 12 sites in five countries with angiographic follow-up and optical coherence tomography at four or nine months. At four months, a lower percentage of malapposed stent struts was observed in the STENTYS group (N=21; Nstruts=501) compared with controls (N=26; Nstruts=326; 0.07% vs. 1.16%; p=0.002) with significantly more covered struts, using a 20 µm cut-off (94.32% vs. 89.09%; p=0.003). At nine months, the primary endpoint (percentage malapposed stent struts) was similar in both groups (STENTYS, N=40; Nstruts=566; control, N=21; Nstruts=292), showing complete apposition (p=0.55) and near total (>96%) coverage (p=0.58).

Conclusions: In STEMI patients undergoing PPCI, the self-apposing, sirolimus-eluting STENTYS stent was equivalent to a conventional drug-eluting balloon-expandable stent with respect to late stent strut apposition and coverage at nine months. However, stent strut apposition and coverage at four months were significantly better in the STENTYS group.

Malapposition, Percutaneous coronary intervention, Self-apposing stent, Self-expanding stent, St-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), Strut coverage
dx.doi.org/10.4244/EIJV11I11A248, hdl.handle.net/1765/82438
EuroIntervention
Department of Cardiology

van Geuns, R.J.M, Yetgin, T, La Manna, A, Tamburino, C, Souteyrand, G, Motreff, P, … Wijns, W. (2016). STENTYS self-apposing® sirolimus-eluting STENT in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: Results from the randomised apposition IV trial. EuroIntervention, 11(11), e1267–e1274. doi:10.4244/EIJV11I11A248