2004
Democratisation of scientific advice
Publication
Publication
BMJ British medical journal , Volume 329 p. 1339- 1341
Summary points
Scientific advisory bodies face increasing calls to be transparent and allow public participation
Advisory bodies need to provide substantive rather than full procedural transparency Substantive transparency requires some parts of the advisory process to be concealed from the public
Attributing experiential or consequential expertise enables lay voices to be heard in the advisory process
Additional Metadata | |
---|---|
, , , , , | |
doi.org/10.1136/bmj.329.7478.1339, hdl.handle.net/1765/8275 | |
BMJ British medical journal | |
Organisation | Erasmus MC: University Medical Center Rotterdam |
Bal, R., Bijker, W., & Hendriks, R. (2004). Democratisation of scientific advice. BMJ British medical journal, 329, 1339–1341. doi:10.1136/bmj.329.7478.1339 |