Objective: This study aims to determine the impact of using a prediction model for recurrent preeclampsia to customize antenatal care in subsequent pregnancies.
Methods: We compared care consumption, pregnancy outcomes, and self-reported health state of two risk-based subgroups, and compared these to a reference group receiving standard care.
Results: We included a total of 311 women from 12 hospitals. Compared to standard care, recurrence-risk guided care did not lead to different outcomes or self-perceived health.
Conclusion: Our study exemplifies that recurrence-risk-based stratification of antenatal care in former preeclampsia patients is feasible; it does not lead to worse pregnancy outcomes.

Impact, prediction model, preeclampsia, recurrence, validation
dx.doi.org/10.3109/10641955.2015.1100310, hdl.handle.net/1765/83153
Hypertension in Pregnancy
Department of Gynaecology & Obstetrics

van Kuijk, S.M.J, Delahaije, D.H.J, Dirksen, C.D, Scheepers, H.C.J, Spaanderman, M.E.A, Ganzevoort, W, … Smits, L.J. (2016). Multicenter impact analysis of a model for predicting recurrent early-onset preeclampsia: A before-after study. Hypertension in Pregnancy, 35(1), 42–54. doi:10.3109/10641955.2015.1100310