Long-term results of a randomized double-blinded prospective trial of a lightweight (ultrapro) versus a heavyweight mesh (prolene) in laparoscopic total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair (TULP-trial)

2016

Annals of Surgery , Volume 263 - Issue 5 p. 862- 866

Additional Metadata
Keywords	Chronic inguinal pain, Heavyweight mesh, Lightweight mesh, Mesh awareness, Quality of life, Recurrence, TEP repair
Persistent URL	doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001579, hdl.handle.net/1765/83226
Journal	Annals of Surgery
Organisation	Department of Surgery
Citation APA APA Style APA-ALL Style AAA Style Cell Style Chicago Style Harvard Style IEEE Style MLA Style Nature Style Vancouver Style American-Institute-of-Physics Style Council-of-Science-Editors Style BibTex Format Endnote Format RIS Format CSL Format DOIs only Format	Burgmans, J. P. J., Voorbrood, C. E. H., Simmermacher, R. K. J., Schouten, N., Smakman, N., Clevers, G., Davids, P., Verleisdonk, E., Hamaker, M. E., Lange, J.& van Dalen, T. (2016). Long-term results of a randomized double-blinded prospective trial of a lightweight (ultrapro) versus a heavyweight mesh (prolene) in laparoscopic total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair (TULP-trial). Annals of Surgery, 263(5), 862–866.https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001579

Publication