Without definitional clarity the 'quango debate' is inherently flawed and meaningful progress undermined. A possible solution to this problem is proposed in this article by way of a subsectional map which aims to clarify the quango topography. This accepts the diversity inherent in the quango debate whilst allowing for increased clarity and focused research. This, the authors believe, is the only way forward for practitioners, academics and policy makers working within the sphere of quasi-government. There is a need to address precise forms or subsections of the quango continuum as studies or reforms which focus on one type of quango would not necessarily work if applied to all quangos, or quangos in other countries.

Agencies, Government, Public Bodies, Quangos, Reform
hdl.handle.net/1765/847
Department of Public Administration

Greve, C, Flinders, M, & van Thiel, S. (1999). Quangos - What's in a name? Defining Quangos from a Comparative Perspective. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1765/847