2016-03-04
Response to Comment on "Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science"
Publication
Publication
Science , Volume 351 - Issue 6277
Gilbert et al. conclude that evidence from the Open Science Collaboration’s Reproducibility Project: Psychology indicates high reproducibility, given the study methodology. Their very optimistic assessment is limited by statistical misconceptions and by causal inferences from selectively interpreted, correlational data. Using the Reproducibility Project: Psychology data, both optimistic and pessimistic conclusions about reproducibility are possible, and neither are yet warranted.
| Additional Metadata | |
|---|---|
| dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.aad9163, hdl.handle.net/1765/85657 | |
| Science | |
| Organisation | Erasmus MC: University Medical Center Rotterdam |
|
Anderson, C.J, Bahník, S, Barnett-Cowan, M, Bosco, F.A, Chandler, J, Chartier, C.R, … Zuni, K. (2016). Response to Comment on "Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science". Science (Vol. 351). doi:10.1126/science.aad9163
|
|