Developing drugs for use before, during and soon after percutaneous coronary intervention
Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy , Volume 17 - Issue 6 p. 803- 818
Introduction: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a milestone for treating coronary artery disease (CAD). Antithrombotic therapy is essential to prevent ischemic complications, including the microvascular no-reflow, while minimizing bleeding events.Areas covered: This overview discusses available and developing drugs for PCI including anticoagulants, antiplatelets and treatment of no-reflow.Expert opinion: For years unfractionated heparin (UFH) has been the unique anticoagulant to be used before and during PCI. Enoxaparin showed similar efficacy and safety, yet, based on recent trials, bivalirudin has been shown to have some benefits, particularly for patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The evidence concerning new anticoagulants is still preliminary, except for new oral anticoagulants, particularly rivaroxaban that showed intriguing findings and is currently under investigation. Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is the standard of care after PCI, but new developments have recently emerged. Indeed, ticagrelor and prasugrel are currently recommended over clopidogrel due to their significant reduction of ischemic events in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) whereas clopidogrel remains the choice in stable CAD. Among new agents, vorapaxar and cangrelor showed positive but limited evidence and might be considered at least in selected patients. Conversely, evidence on effective treatments for no-reflow remains limited and would require future dedicated research.
|anticoagulant, antiplatelet, Drugs, no-reflow, percutaneous coronary intervention|
|Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy|
|Organisation||Erasmus MC: University Medical Center Rotterdam|
Gargiulo, G, Moschovitis, A, Windecker, S.W, & Valgimigli, M. (2016). Developing drugs for use before, during and soon after percutaneous coronary intervention. Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy (Vol. 17, pp. 803–818). doi:10.1517/14656566.2016.1145666