This paper addresses and explores the different strategies governments pursue to support the introduction of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs) and battery electric vehicles (BEVs). This paper presents findings from a European research project that mapped current policies in eight countries, with California as a comparative case to contrast the European findings. The authors analysed the policy strategies that countries have put to practice and analyse how they have performed so far. Arguably, many countries appear to be on track to achieving their short-term goals; in that sense, EV policy is successful. However, once the longer term policy goals for e-mobility are taken into account, it is unlikely that the current policies will be sufficient. Therefore, the authors point out some lessons from current polĀ­icies that may show a route into the next phase of the introduction of e-mobility. The paper is part of the Interreg e-mobility North Sea Region (E-Mobility NSR) partnership project, which is co-funded by the EU and participating countries/ regions/organisations.

, , ,
doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13194-8_2, hdl.handle.net/1765/86915
Erasmus University Rotterdam

van der Steen, M., Van Schelven, R. M., Kotter, R., van Twist, M., & Van Deventer Mpa, P. (2015). EV policy compared: An international comparison of governments' policy strategy towards E-mobility. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-13194-8_2