Cost-effectiveness of lung transplantation in The Netherlands: a scenario analysis
Chest: the cardiopulmonary and critical care journal , Volume 113 (1998) - Issue 1 p. 124- 130
STUDY OBJECTIVES: To calculate cost-effectiveness of scenarios concerning lung transplantation in The Netherlands.
DESIGN: Microsimulation model predicting survival, quality of life, and costs with and without transplantation program, based on data of the Dutch lung transplantation program of 1990 to 1995.
SETTING: Netherlands, University Hospital Groningen.
PATIENTS: Included were 425 patients referred for lung transplantation, of whom 57 underwent transplantation.
INTERVENTION: Lung transplantation.
RESULTS: For the baseline scenario, the costs per life-year gained are G 194,000 (G=Netherlands guilders) and the costs per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained are G 167,000. Restricting patient inflow ("policy scenario") lowers the costs per life-year gained: G 172,000 (costs per QALY gained: G 144,000). The supply of more donor lungs could reduce the costs per life-year gained to G 159,000 (G 135,000 per QALY gained; G1 =US $0.6, based on exchange rate at the time of the study).
CONCLUSIONS: Lung transplantation is an expensive but effective intervention: survival and quality of life improve substantially after transplantation. The costs per life-year gained are relatively high, compared with other interventions and other types of transplantation. Restricting the patient inflow and/or raising donor supply improves cost-effectiveness to some degree. Limiting the extent of inpatient screening or lower future costs of immunosuppressives may slightly improve the cost-effectiveness of the program.
|, , , , , , , , , , ,|
|Chest: the cardiopulmonary and critical care journal|
|Organisation||Erasmus MC: University Medical Center Rotterdam|
Al, M.J, Koopmanschap, M.A, van Enckevort, P.J, Geertsma, A, van der Bij, W, de Boer, W.J, & Tenvergert, E.M. (1998). Cost-effectiveness of lung transplantation in The Netherlands: a scenario analysis. Chest: the cardiopulmonary and critical care journal, 113 (1998)(1), 124–130. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1765/8762